FTC Non-Compete Ban
The FTC's 2024 rule attempting to ban most non-compete agreements nationwide — largely blocked by courts as of 2024, but still shaping how non-competes are negotiated.
In April 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a sweeping rule that would have banned most non-compete agreements for almost all US workers. Under the rule, existing non-competes for non-senior executives would be unenforceable, and new non-competes would be prohibited entirely. The FTC estimated the rule would affect approximately 30 million US workers and, according to its own analysis, would increase worker earnings by $300 billion annually by restoring labor market mobility.
The rule was challenged immediately in federal court. In August 2024, a federal district court in Texas issued a nationwide injunction blocking the rule from taking effect, finding that the FTC lacked the statutory authority to issue such a broad, categorical ban. The FTC appealed, but as of late 2024, the ban remained blocked. The legal battle is expected to continue through the federal courts, and the rule's ultimate fate depends on both the outcome of that litigation and the composition of future FTC leadership.
Even with the federal ban blocked, the legal and cultural landscape around non-competes has shifted significantly. Several states — California, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and others — already ban or severely restrict non-competes as a matter of state law. Many more states have narrowed their scope or enforceability in recent years. The FTC action, even if ultimately unsuccessful, has made non-compete clauses more visible in negotiations, more frequently challenged, and more scrutinized by employers worried about enforcement.
Current Non-Compete Status by State
- California: non-competes are virtually unenforceable. Employees can work for competitors immediately after leaving.
- Minnesota: banned new non-competes effective January 2023.
- North Dakota and Oklahoma: longstanding bans on non-compete enforcement.
- Illinois, Virginia, Maryland, Washington: salary thresholds below which non-competes are unenforceable.
- Most other states: enforce non-competes if 'reasonable' in scope, geography, and duration — but courts scrutinize heavily.
- Florida: one of the most employer-friendly states for non-compete enforcement.
Negotiating Non-Competes in the Interim
- Even where legal, non-competes are often negotiable — ask to narrow the geographic scope, duration, or definition of 'competitive' activity.
- Garden leave clauses (employer pays your salary during the non-compete period) are more enforceable and fairer — push for this.
- Ask whether the non-compete is truly necessary for your role — many companies include them as boilerplate without actual enforcement intent.
- Document any oral assurances that the non-compete 'won't be enforced' — they're not legally binding, but they inform the negotiation.
- If you're in a state that already bans non-competes (California, Minnesota, ND, OK), the clause is likely unenforceable regardless of what you sign.