Company Values
The stated principles that guide an organization's decisions and behavior — useful when they're genuine, misleading when they're aspirational theater, and always worth investigating before joining.
Company values are the stated principles — usually a short list of words or phrases — that an organization uses to describe the beliefs and behaviors it considers central to its identity. They typically appear on career pages, in onboarding materials, and in leadership communications. Examples range from the generic (Integrity, Innovation, Collaboration) to the specific (Amazon's 16 Leadership Principles, Netflix's 'Keeper Test' culture, Patagonia's environmental commitments). Values are meant to guide decision-making, shape culture, and signal what the company stands for to employees, customers, and candidates.
The critical distinction in practice is between stated values and lived values. Stated values are what appears in the culture deck; lived values are what's actually rewarded, promoted, and tolerated — which are often quite different. A company that lists 'Transparency' as a core value but withholds information from employees during restructurings, or one that espouses 'Work-Life Balance' but promotes only those who work 60-hour weeks, has a values gap. These gaps are among the most reliable predictors of employee disillusionment: people join for the stated values and leave because of the lived ones.
For candidates evaluating companies, values are most useful as a starting point for investigation rather than a conclusion. The right question isn't 'do I like these values?' but 'can I verify that these values actually describe how this company operates?' Behavioral interview questions, Glassdoor reviews, conversations with current and former employees, and observation of how the company has behaved under pressure (during layoffs, controversies, or public challenges) are all more informative than the values statement itself. The companies with the most impressive values rhetoric are sometimes the ones with the largest gap between aspiration and reality.
How to Evaluate Whether Values Are Real
- Ask behavioral questions in interviews: 'Can you give me an example of a time the company made a decision that demonstrated [stated value]?' forces a specific answer.
- Ask about trade-offs: 'Has there ever been a situation where [value] conflicted with something else important, like hitting a revenue target? How was it resolved?' reveals priority ordering.
- Look at promotion patterns: who actually gets promoted? What behaviors are rewarded? These reveal the lived values more reliably than anything stated.
- Read Glassdoor across multiple reviews and time periods: patterns in the 'cons' section that echo the 'pros' of the stated values are a red flag.
- Look at how the company has behaved in adversity: layoffs, controversies, and public challenges reveal character more reliably than a period of smooth growth.
- Ask current employees what surprised them after joining: what they expected based on stated values vs. what they found is exactly the gap you're trying to measure.
Why Values Matter Beyond Culture Fit
Values matter because they predict behavior, and behavior predicts your experience. An organization that genuinely values psychological safety will handle mistakes differently than one that doesn't. One that genuinely values transparency will communicate differently during uncertainty. One that genuinely values growth will invest in its people differently. When values are genuinely lived, they create coherent, predictable environments where you can make decisions knowing what the organization will reward and what it will penalize. When values are performative, you're flying blind — the stated map doesn't match the territory, and you spend energy navigating the gap rather than doing your best work. This is why identifying companies where the stated and lived values align — even if the stated values aren't perfectly to your taste — tends to produce better outcomes than joining for values rhetoric alone.
Example
A candidate sees 'candor' prominently listed in a company's values. She tests it in an interview: 'What's a decision the company has made in the last year that some employees pushed back on, and how was that handled?' The interviewer pauses, then gives a specific, nuanced answer about a return-to-office mandate, internal dissent, and how leadership incorporated some of the feedback while holding firm on others. The specificity and honesty of the answer tell her more about the culture than the word 'candor' on a website.